19M+
hours studied
+128%
boost in participation rates
+2x-3x
capture of reimbursable hours
Time Study for Finance & Compliance Teams
Is Your Program Built to Be Defended?
Most programs aren't. The gaps that create audit exposure are predictable:
Participation records that can't demonstrate statistical validity
Methodology that was applied inconsistently across departments or cycles
No documented chain from study data to cost report entries
Validation that was assumed rather than performed
Documentation that passed internally but won't hold under external review
What Audit-Readiness Actually Requires
A Clear Documentation Chain
Finance and compliance need to reconstruct, at any point, exactly how study data became cost report entries.
Participation Standards with Monitoring
Minimum thresholds mean nothing without real-time visibility and a process to close gaps before the study cycle ends.
Validation Built Into the Workflow
Errors caught during administration are a process working. Errors caught in an audit are a liability.
Documented Methodology & Leadership Support
A defensible program starts with executive buy-in , running on clear business rules that are written down, consistently applied, and reviewable—not held in institutional memory.
Why It Matters
Why Audit-Readiness and Financial Performance Are the Same Work
Defensible documentation supports maximum reimbursement, not just audit survival
Programs built for scrutiny catch errors before they reach cost report submissions
Consistent methodology across cycles prevents the internal contradictions reviewers exploit
Proactive audit-readiness costs significantly less than reactive remediation
Cross-functional ownership closes the blind spots that single-function programs miss